Wow! Thank you, Olga. I find your process incredibly fascinating and am definitely interested in delving deeper. As you can probably tell, I was having trouble inserting my photos into the comment box. I will wait until I am able to do so (hopefully someone can help me) before I insert my images in those threads.
I just have one question about my typing results: So if I am not very extraverted, would this mean that I would be the IEI subtype then? I can definitely see the EIE subtype as plausible and it would explain my typing difficulties in so many ways. I am extraverted in a sense that I need to have attention and to interact with people, but I am lacking in assertiveness. Some may see me as introverted because of this.
Thanks again for all the effort that everyone has put into my typing process.
Susan.
Susan, welcome.
Do you wish to insert your pictures here on this forum? I get the link from any other internet resource like photo-bucket and click on the Madonna picture symbol and it works. )
I would say that IEI subtype would suit more because there is a lot of introverted and dynamic energy in your art. The socionists from my school at the beginning did not see extraversion at all, there is a lot of introverted dynamics in our art preferences. It was too much Ni.
But the fact is that you are an extravert and it is very clearly in your video, in the way you write and talk quite a lot - the volume of your sociability is high. So we understood that Superid (SI) energy in the art preference must be compensation.
Your new pictures point to ethics and may be extraverted ethics - the lady on the portrait radiates happy energy, look open and friendly. In the picture with the river and lights I see introverted dynamics (Ni, SI-energy): contrast in orange and dark blue colour and the waves of the river- movement.
The paper project - introverted profile ( SI - SE). You use white colour of paper (SE- energy) but two many shapes create introverted dynamics - too many small details make the image complex and moving, making the eye wonder from one little image to another. This implies a process and the food for perception/imagination. Therefore this project is definitely irrational/perceptive.
Topic: Susan Elizabeth Harris-Gamard (Read 5792 times)